Below we provide some examples of the things you could include in this statement. Please note that these are not expectations and not intended to be prescriptive. Rather, they are intended to provide inspiration when considering your inclusive selection process. You may also want to refer to EPSRC’s report on good practice for inclusive university selection processes.
How were applications assessed? For example:
- Panel members scored applicants ahead of a selection meeting;
- Applications were anonymised;
- Applicants were scored solely on their BBSRC Fellowships Outline application;
- Experts were allocated to introduce each application;
- Candidates were interviewed;
- Candidates were scored against the Early Independence: BBSRC Fellowships: Full stage call criteria
- Candidates’ experience was considered relative to their career stage
How were assessment panels selected and prepared? For example:
- The panel was diverse in terms of protected characteristics;
- Panellists received unconscious bias training and were encouraged to call out any perceived bias;
- The panel included members with EDI expertise;
- The panel included members with expertise in supporting the career development of Early Career Researchers
How were applicants supported throughout the process? For example:
- Reasonable adjustments were offered and made to applicants where appropriate
- Constructive feedback was provided to unsuccessful candidates
- Selected candidates were supported in writing their full application
There is a limit of 3000 characters
There is a limit of 3000 characters
There is a limit of 3000 characters
