Open Activities
-
Selector Areas of Expertise
Thank you for being one of our Expert Reviewer Selectors. To support the effective allocation of applications to Selectors we are seeking updated and consistently captured information about your areas of expertise.
Closes 5 July 2026
-
Involving people in non-clinical research
Share your story: involving people in non-clinical research Are you or your researchers successfully involving the public in non-clinical research? We’re looking for examples to help showcase the value public involvement can bring, specifically where there is no obvious...
Closes 8 July 2026
-
Collecting feedback for EPSRC training for the Funding Service
To collect feedback for the new training modules centered around the Funding Service, as supported by the Business Improvement Team (BIT).
Closes 14 July 2026
-
NQCC doctoral studentship scheme 2027: Project proposal EOI
The National Quantum Computing Centre has 6 funded studentships available to UK universities to run from autumn 2027. These studentships will form the third cohort of the NQCC’s Doctoral Studentship Scheme. The funding will be provided through EPSRC Industrial Doctoral Landscape Awards (IDLA), with...
Closes 14 July 2026
-
Inclusive selection statement for Future Leaders Fellowship Round 11
Inclusive selection statement required for UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship scheme. Please provide details on how you select which applicants to put forward for the scheme and how you ensure this process if fair and inclusive.
Closes 15 July 2026
-
NQCC Trapped Ion Workshop
The NQCC Trapped Ion Workshop will bring together industry and academic leaders from the community to discuss the requirements and challenges to reach a MQuOP trapped ion quantum computing system: the first milestone of Quantum Mission 1. 📅 Date: Tuesday 15 th September 2026 🕒 ...
Closes 15 July 2026
-
Diversity Monitoring Data
Diversity data required for UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship internal selection process within host organisations. Please answer the following questions to provide data on the unsuccessful applicants within your organisation who applied via your own internal selection process to be put forward for...
Closes 15 July 2026
-
College of Experts
Thank you for being part of the College of Experts. To support the effective allocation of applications throughout the assessment process, we are seeking updated information about your areas of expertise, experience, and diversity characteristics. Collecting this information helps us build a...
Closes 15 July 2026
-
Expression of Interest: Gambling Harms Research Grants
Expression of interest You are invited to complete this survey to register your expression of interest (EOI) in applying for funding to support research in gambling harms. Full details of the opportunity are available in the pre-announcement: 'Gambling harms research grants'. ...
Closes 17 July 2026
Forthcoming Consultations
-
LOTF_10203938
You will be asked to score 3 questions: Business Case (out of 10) Technical Case (out of 10) Funding and Added Value (out of 5) Then you will be asked 3 unscored questions which will input to the portfolio decision (Yes or No) Finally you will be asked if you recommend this...
Opens 13 July 2026
-
LOTF_10204076
You will be asked to score 3 questions: Business Case (out of 10) Technical Case (out of 10) Funding and Added Value (out of 5) Then you will be asked 3 unscored questions which will input to the portfolio decision (Yes or No) Finally you will be asked if you recommend this...
Opens 13 July 2026
-
BatteryInnovation_R2_10201380
You will be asked to score 3 questions: Business Case (out of 10) Technical Case (out of 10) Funding and Added Value (out of 5) Then you will be asked if you recommend this project for funding (Yes or No)
Opens 17 July 2026
-
BatteryInnovation_R2_10201762
You will be asked to score 3 questions: Business Case (out of 10) Technical Case (out of 10) Funding and Added Value (out of 5) Then you will be asked if you recommend this project for funding (Yes or No)
Opens 17 July 2026
-
BatteryInnovation_R2_10201584
You will be asked to score 3 questions: Business Case (out of 10) Technical Case (out of 10) Funding and Added Value (out of 5) Then you will be asked if you recommend this project for funding (Yes or No)
Opens 17 July 2026
Closed Activities
-
UKRI Public Contributor role survey
UKRI are reviewing how members of the public are named on grant applications for our funding. In 2024, we enabled members of the public to join research teams in our funded grants by applying as Public Contributors within our Specialist grant role. We are now looking to create a...
Closed 3 July 2026
-
Pre-application funding awardees post June 2026 event survey
MRC pre-application funding awardees post event survey
Closed 3 July 2026
-
DRIVE35 Scale-up Fund DD3 Interview 10197677 Recyclus
DRIVE35 Scale-up Fund Scoring - Recyclus
Closed 2 July 2026
-
DRIVE35 Scale-up Fund DD3 Interview 10206152 Strip Tinning
DRIVE35 Scale-up Fund Scoring - Strip Tinning
Closed 2 July 2026
-
DRIVE35 Scale-up Fund DD3 Interview 10198608 Longbow
DRIVE35 Scale-up Fund Scoring
Closed 1 July 2026
We Asked, You Said, We Did
See what we've consulted on. See all outcomes
We asked
In this exercise we asked for views on a series of topic guides that we are using to inform our communications with students. This follows changes to the UKRI Standard Terms and Conditions of Training Grant introduced on 1 October.
We provided guides in ten sections. We said we would welcome comments from people working in research organisations about whether the messages will support their own communications.
You said
We received 68 responses to the exercise.
91% of respondents said that, overall, the guides would be helpful or very helpful (excludes ‘not answered’).
While you said that the content was helpful or very helpful, you also provided many useful comments on the guides themselves. Respondents highlighted areas where we should consider how a student might interpret the guide, institutional variations and other factors. A number of comments felt the guides needed to be shorter.
General comments included:
“…these topic guides are really helpful and accessible. Lots of information and generally clearly set out.“
“Make all of it more concise”
“UKRI info needs to be read in conjunction with local institutional policies”
“I have supported PGRs for a number of years and I have seen that a significant number suffer with their mental health. Anything that we can do to support this and ensure they know they will be supported is important.”
We did
Today (5 November 2025), we published guidance for UKRI funded students.
In keeping with some of the feedback we received, the new web content on UKRI.org is short and concise. You can comment on the live content using the feedback link at the bottom of the webpage.
We are developing more communications for the near future which are informed by the comments submitted by respondents to this excercise. We will provide more information to grant holders before any further communications go live.
We asked
In September 2024 the Internal Customer Experience Team (Fanni Byrne & Stephen Lane) set up separate monthly engagement sessions with each Net Zero theme.
These sessions were set up so that the domain colleagues can build relationships with the Pre & Post Award Leads (within IUK Operations Becky Green & Adam Medley), learn about Operational updates and process changes, ask questions and share feedback on operational delivery.
These sessions were set up for a trial period and as our internal customers, we wanted to understand how the domain colleagues would like us to engage with the domain to ensure they receive the best service.
You said
The survey was shared with 80 recipients, targeting Innovation Leads, Impact & Performance Managers and Project and Programme Managers.
- We received 24 responses
- Out of those who completed the survey, 70% previously attended the sessions, this number is 21% of the overall domain
- 63% thought that having a regular drop-in session available was a good concept
- 87% would like to have a virtual forum for meeting your Pre & Post Award Operational Leads alongside your Customer Relationship Manager
- 46% voted to have 3 monthly drop in sessions and 29% voted for monthly sessions
- 54% voted to have one session for the whole of Net Zero domain in order to foster great collaboration and provide cross-domain insights across the 4 themes
Most colleagues described the sessions as helpful and a great initiative.
Collagues also claimed that having multiple people from various teams (even within Net Zero themes) offers different input/answers with different focus that can raise organizational awareness and good opportunity for building relationships with the right people.
We did
The Customer Experience Team reviewed the feedback with the Pre & Post Award Operational Leads.
Next steps
After reviewing the feedback, the Customer Experience team with your Pre & Post Award Operational Leads will schedule in the sessions for the overall domain every other month from September 2025 onwards.
Please look out for the meeting invites in your inboxes and share the information amongst your teams and themes within Net Zero!
We asked
In January 2024, we asked for feedback on the Medical Research Council’s (MRC's) draft public partnerships strategy. The strategy was drafted following a process of co-development and sets out MRC’s ambition and priorities for effective collaboration and genuine partnerships between the research community and wider society.
You said
We received 354 responses to the consultation. These responses came from a variety of individuals, groups, and organisations from the research community, the voluntary sector and wider society. The consultation responses were overwhelmingly positive. 87% agreed with the strategy overall, and 81% said that the strategy was written in clear language.
Respondents welcomed specific aspects of the strategy, including its inclusiveness, the focus on non-clinical research and the ambition to build long-term sustainable partnerships between the research community and wider society. Respondents highlighted specific initiatives which they considered vital to the success of the strategy such as, having a clear payment policy, appointing a new MRC programme director for public partnerships, and setting up a public advisory group at MRC.
Respondents recommended that MRC publish the new strategy in a variety of formats, alongside clear delivery (action) and evaluation plans.
We did
We used findings from the consultation to inform the final MRC public partnerships strategy. Key changes included:
- Clearly stating that this strategy is an initial three-year commitment to our long-term ambition
- Clarifying that the strategy has been co-developed
- Specifically mentioning the involvement of international researchers, public partners, and public involvement and engagement professionals
- Making clear that the consultation informed the final strategy
- Emphasising that this strategy is intended to be inclusive, and will be aligned with MRC’s Embedding Diversity in Research Design policy
- Acknowledging the importance of sharing power
- Making clear that we will implement our new payment policy for public partners, and that other rewards and recognition are additional to payment
- Emphasising that we will support public partners to take on leadership roles and responsibilities, such as chairing groups or co-leading projects
- Committing to publish our action and evaluation plans
The consultation findings have been summarised in an infographic and are detailed in full in our consultation report.
Next steps:
The final MRC public partnerships strategy will be published on the MRC website in summer 2024.